NEW YORK – Amazon has sued the U.S. Client Product Security Fee for locating the e-commerce big legally responsible for the remembers of tons of of hundreds of merchandise bought on its website.
The impartial federal company ordered Amazon in January to take a number of actions, together with notifying prospects who purchased greater than 400,000 objects coated by remembers and giving refunds to those that may show the merchandise have been correctly disposed of or destroyed.
The order adopted the fee’s unanimous willpower final summer time that Amazon was a “distributor” of defective objects bought on its web site by third-party sellers and shipped by means of the corporate’s success service
However Amazon has lengthy disputed it qualifies as a “distributor” of merchandise supplied by different sellers. In its lawsuit filed on March 14, the corporate maintained it serves as a “third-party logistics supplier” and due to this fact shouldn’t be held answerable for remembers of merchandise that have been made, owned and bought by others.
The fee sued Amazon in 2021 for allegedly distributing hazardous items, accusing the corporate of placing consumer safety in danger by failing to correctly notify the general public about recalled merchandise that included faulty carbon monoxide detectors and flammable youngsters’s pajamas.
Amazon stated in its lawsuit that it issued earlier recall notices and a few refunds shortly after the CPSC raised security issues a number of years in the past. The corporate argues the fee is an “unconstitutionally structured company” that overstepped its authority with the brand new directive.
“The treatments ordered by the CPSC are largely duplicative of the steps we took a number of years in the past to guard prospects, that are the identical steps we take at any time when we study unsafe merchandise,” Amazon stated in a press release despatched to The Related Press. The Seattle-based firm stated it couldn’t remark additional on its lawsuit filed final week.
Amazon and Elon Musk’s SpaceX even have lively lawsuits difficult the construction of the Nationwide Labor Relations Board as unconstitutional. The two companies initiated the instances after the labor company filed complaints towards them in disputes about employees’ rights and union organizing.
The Client Product Security Fee declined to remark Wednesday on Amazon’s lawsuit grievance. In a Jan. 17 assertion concerning the hazardous merchandise order, Commissioner Richard L. Trumka Jr. stated it was the CPSC’s job to “maintain corporations like Amazon accountable” and “no firm is above the legislation.”
Copyright 2025 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials will not be printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.
