PARIS – OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has dismissed a $97.4 billion takeover bid led by rival Elon Musk, however the unsolicited provide may complicate Altman’s push to remodel the maker of ChatGPT right into a for-profit firm.
“We’re not on the market,” Altman mentioned Tuesday at a man-made intelligence summit in Paris.
Musk’s bid, introduced Monday, is the most recent in a bitter years-long battle with Altman over management of the AI startup they each helped discovered a decade in the past as a nonprofit and is now a number one pressure within the world increase surrounding generative AI know-how.
“OpenAI has a mission,” Altman advised France’s AI minister in an on-stage dialogue Tuesday mobbed by tech business staff and buyers. “We’re an uncommon group and now we have this mission of creating AGI profit all humanity. And we’re right here to do this.”
Its said purpose since its founding in 2015 is to securely construct futuristic, better-than-human AI often known as synthetic common intelligence, or AGI. Musk, an early investor and board member, give up OpenAI in 2018 after an inner energy wrestle left Altman in cost.
Their public feud has escalated over the previous 12 months as Musk sued OpenAI and is working to develop his personal AI firm known as xAI, a part of a enterprise empire that features Tesla, SpaceX and social media platform X. Musk additionally now holds energy as a prime adviser to President Donald Trump in reshaping the U.S. authorities, and has publicly questioned OpenAI’s Trump-backed private investment project for constructing AI information facilities in america.
What occurs subsequent?
The provide complicates OpenAI’s plan to shift its construction away from its nonprofit roots to an organization beholden to shareholders.
OpenAI’s nonprofit board might want to contemplate Musk’s provide. It is not Altman alone who can settle for or reject it.
The board might want to weigh not simply the worth of the corporate’s property but additionally the worth of controlling the corporate creating this know-how. Musk’s provide additionally appears to set a flooring for a way a lot the nonprofit ought to be paid if it does relinquish management of its subsidiaries.
Rose Chan Loui, government director for the Lowell Milken Middle on Philanthropy and Nonprofits at UCLA Regulation, mentioned the board ought to contemplate the credibility of Musk’s provide, together with if he and his buyers can pay in money. And they need to contemplate whether or not a brand new board below the management of Musk and different buyers can be impartial and what ensures they can provide about defending its public mission.
Musk’s $44 billion Twitter takeover in 2022 additionally began with an unsolicited provide and a authorized combat with Twitter’s board, led by former Fb and Salesforce government Bret Taylor, who now chairs OpenAI’s board. Nevertheless, taking on OpenAI can be extra difficult due to its charitable goal.
“There’s a legally binding goal,” mentioned Jill Horwitz, a professor at UCLA College of Regulation. “It’s the promise that was made to the general public when OpenAI, the nonprofit, was shaped. That promise is legally enforceable.”
The sudden reputation of ChatGPT two years in the past introduced worldwide fame and new business prospects to OpenAI and in addition heightened inner turmoil over the way forward for the group and the superior AI it was making an attempt to develop. Its nonprofit board fired Altman in late 2023. He got here again days later with a brand new board.
OpenAI’s nonprofit issues
OpenAI’s nonprofit goal, as outlined most lately in 2020, is “(to) be certain that synthetic common intelligence advantages all of humanity, together with by conducting and/or funding synthetic intelligence analysis.”
The query is, can it try this if it sells its property and loses management of the corporate creating this know-how?
“To make the promise to the world that you’re certain by a authorized goal and to construct with that promise, together with telling your buyers to not count on any returns and to consider your investments as extra akin to a donation than an funding,” mentioned Horwitz. “After which to say when you’ve gotten large enough, ’ what? We’d prefer to personal this. That looks as if an actual violation of the promise.”
Musk sued OpenAI final 12 months, first in a California state courtroom and later in federal courtroom, alleging it had betrayed its founding goals as a nonprofit analysis lab that might profit the general public good. A lawyer for Musk has mentioned he invested about $45 million within the startup from its founding till 2018.
Attorneys for OpenAI and Musk confronted off in a California federal courtroom final week as a decide weighed Musk’s request for a courtroom order that might block OpenAI’s for-profit conversion.
The decide hasn’t but dominated on Musk’s request however within the courtroom mentioned it was a “stretch” for Musk to assert he shall be irreparably harmed if she doesn’t intervene to cease OpenAI from transferring ahead with its deliberate transition. However she additionally prompt Musk had believable sufficient arguments to take to a jury trial.
Who else is backing Musk’s OpenAI bid?
Together with Musk and xAI, others backing the bid introduced Monday embody Baron Capital Group, Valor Administration, Atreides Administration, Vy Fund ,and corporations run by Musk allies Ari Emanuel and Jon Lonsdale.
Musk legal professional Marc Toberoff mentioned in an announcement that if Altman and OpenAI’s present board “are intent on changing into a completely for-profit company, it’s important that the charity be pretty compensated for what its management is taking away from it: management over probably the most transformative know-how of our time.”
Altman has sought to characterize Musk’s techniques as these of a competitor making an attempt to catch up.
“I feel he’s in all probability simply making an attempt to sluggish us down. He clearly is a competitor,” Altman advised Bloomberg TV on the Paris summit on Tuesday.
Persevering with their deeply private feud, Altman mentioned Musk might be not a “pleased individual.”
“In all probability his entire life is from a place of insecurity. I really feel for the man,” Altman mentioned.
—-
O’Brien reported from Windfall, Rhode Island, and Beaty from Seattle.
—-
The Related Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement that enables OpenAI entry to a part of AP’s textual content archives.
Copyright 2025 The Related Press. All rights reserved. This materials is probably not printed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed with out permission.
